Federalizing the National Guard Away From the Governors
December 4, 2008
Here’s an amazing thing happening right before our very eyes and you don’t hear anything about it. Defense Secretary Robert Gates and the Pentagon are obviously in the process of implementing the John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007. The act changed federal law so that the Governor of a state is no longer the sole commander in chief of their state’s National Guard during emergencies within the state, a direct violation of Article I, Section 10 and Clause 3 of the Constitution. As original envisioned by the founders, who rightfully feared standing armies, active and reserve military organizations were to be limited in size and scope and complemented by citizen-soldiers. The the John Warner Defense Authorization Act has finally put to rest the idea that these citizen-soldiers will not be federalized. Here’s the article:
Gates announces plan to make National Guard a Homeland “Operational Force”
Defense Secretary Robert Gates has ordered the Pentagon to conduct a “broad review” to determine if the military and the National Guard and Reserve can “adequately deal with domestic disasters,” including “a catastrophic attack on the country.”
Gates’ order falls on the heels of an earlier report released by the Commission on the National Guard and Reserves urging the Pentagon to “use the nation’s citizen soldiers to create an operational force that would be fully trained, equipped and ready to defend the nation.”
Gates and the Pentagon are obviously in the process of implementing the John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007. The act changed federal law so that the Governor of a state is no longer the sole commander in chief of their state’s National Guard during emergencies within the state, a direct violation of Article I, Section 10 and Clause 3 of the Constitution. As original envisioned by the founders, who rightfully feared standing armies, active and reserve military organizations were to be limited in size and scope and complemented by citizen-soldiers. The the John Warner Defense Authorization Act has finally put to rest the idea that these citizen-soldiers will not be federalized.
It can be argued that the Warner bill is simply a culmination of earlier piecemeal violations, including the Militia Act of 1792, the Insurrection Act of 1807, and in particular the Militia Act of 1903, the latter allowing for the creation of the National Guard of the United States as the primary organized reserve force for the U.S. armed forces. Gates is simply announcing a fiat accompli – the merging of the Department of Defense and the National Guard into one cohesive force that will be deployed domestically in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act which substantially limited the powers of the federal government to use the military for law enforcement. In the past, maintaining order during domestic disasters was the responsibility of local and state law enforcement, although the National Guard was on occasion called in cases of civil unrest.
Gates plan for a review of the National Guard’s role is especially troublesome in the wake of the Pentagon’s announcement in September that the 3rd Infantry Division’s 1st Brigade Combat Team would be deployed domestically by Northcom beginning October 1.
“Beginning Oct. 1 for 12 months, the 1st BCT will be under the day-to-day control of U.S. Army North, the Army service component of Northern Command, as an on-call federal response force for natural or manmade emergencies and disasters, including terrorist attacks,” the Army Times reported on September 30. The battle-hardened brigade, straight out combat duty in Iraq, will engage in “specialty tasks” usually reserved for local law enforcement. In addition, the brigade will use “the first ever nonlethal package that the Army has fielded… designed to subdue unruly or dangerous individuals without killing them,” an especially chilling prospect in light of growing predictions of civil unrest as the economy worsens.
If the Pentagon plan is realized, the National Guard will receive training for “homeland defense and civil support missions, as opposed to the warfighting now consuming them.” The Associated Press admits Gates’ effort is designed to “integrate reservists into the modern day military and consider treating them on a more equal basis to the active duty troops.”
Arnold L. Punaro, former chairman of the commission, welcomed Gates’ recommendations and declared that improving the military’s role in homeland defense and enhancing the clout of the reserves “represent a historic break with the past.” It also represents a “historic break ” with the Constitution of the United States.
Gates and the Pentagon realize the United States does not face a serious external terrorist threat. Instead, it faces in the not too distant future a reaction on the part of the citizenry of the deconstruction of the economy and the social and political chaos that will undoubtedly follow. The National Guard, along with the 3rd Infantry Division’s 1st Brigade Combat Team and other military troops, will use the “nonlethal package… designed to subdue unruly or dangerous individuals” mentioned by the Army Times.
And Harry Reid says your Armpits Smell
December 4, 2008
Harry Reid Says Capitol Visitors Smell
Politicians often get in trouble because of the actions of members of their staff. But, sometimes it pays for elected officials to listen to them. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) is learning that lesson tonight after off the cuff remarks he made at the unveiling of the new Capitol Visitors Center.
The center, like most government projects, is late and over-budget. At a cost of $621 million, the center must certainly have some nice amenities. But for Reid, man of the people, defender of the forgotten, champion of the little guy, the best part about the new Capitol Visitors Center is the air conditioning. Why? Because it will keep the stinking masses away from him.
That’s no exaggeration. Reid said the following at the opening of the center this morning.
“My staff tells me not to say this, but I’m going to say it anyway,” said Reid in his remarks. In the summer because of the heat and high humidity, you could literally smell the tourists coming into the Capitol. It may be descriptive but it’s true.”
Ah, Harry Reid. If he didn’t exist, Republicans would have to invent him. Next time, Senator, listen to your staff.
Delete Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) from the list of admirers of the new Capitol Visitor Center.
DeMint issued a statement Tuesday criticizing the new facility for “omitting the history of faith.” DeMint noted that the new tourist spot ignored his request to include the phrase “In God We Trust” and the Pledge of Allegiance.
DeMint said the center, which opened Tuesday, also has displays that are “left-leaning and in some cases distort our true history.”
Here’s DeMint’s full statement:
“The Capitol Visitor Center is designed to tell the history and purpose of our nation’s Capitol, but it fails to appropriately honor our religious heritage that has been critical to America’s success. While the Architect of the Capitol has pledged to include some references to faith, more needs to be done. You cannot accurately tell the history of America or its Capitol by ignoring the religious heritage of our Founders and the generations since who relied on their faith for strength and guidance. The millions of visitors that will visit the CVC each year should get a true portrayal of the motivations and inspirations of those who have served in Congress since its establishment.
“The current CVC displays are left-leaning and in some cases distort our true history. Exhibits portray the federal government as the fulfillment of human ambition and the answer to all of society’s problems. This is a clear departure from acknowledging that Americans’ rights ‘are endowed by their Creator’ and stem from ‘a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence.’ Instead, the CVC’s most prominent display proclaims faith not in God, but in government. Visitors will enter reading a large engraving that states, ‘We have built no temple but the Capitol. We consult no common oracle but the Constitution.’ This is an intentional misrepresentation of our nation’s real history, and an offensive refusal to honor America’s God-given blessings. As George Washington stated clearly in his first inaugural address:
‘…[I]t would be peculiarly improper to omit in this first official Act, my fervent supplications to that Almighty Being who rules over the Universe, who presides in the Councils of Nations, and whose providential aids can supply every human defect, that his benediction may consecrate to the liberties and happiness of the People of the United States, a Government instituted by themselves for these essential purposes: and may enable every instrument employed in its administration to execute with success, the functions allotted to his charge.’
“The fundamental principles of the freedom we enjoy in this country stem from our Founding Fathers’ beliefs in a higher power, beliefs put forth in the Declaration of Independence and manifest throughout our Constitution,” said Senator DeMint. “If we cease to acknowledge this fact, we may cease to enjoy some of the freedoms we take for granted. We must not censor historical references to God for the sake of political correctness. And we must truthfully represent the limited form of government the Constitution lays out so that our ‘government of the people, by the people, and for the people, shall not perish from the earth.’ So help us God.”
-J. Taylor Rushing
OK, now just a few of the comments posted on the Hill, from the anti-God people. Most backed up Sen. DeMint, but the idiots always express themselves. Can you just imagine how the angels are crying in heaven? I’ll post the link at the end so you can see some of the great ones who actually are learned people who answered these clowns:
1. Leave it to neanderthal Demint to strike a blow against sanity. I guess he’s railing at the fact there are no references to the “flat earth” and that we don’t honor our history of slavery. Complete idiot. It’s sad that even in this great visitors’ center, someone like Demint has to create some straw dog like “left leaning.” Unbelievable.
2. This is exactly what’s wrong with today’s GOP and the reason it’s hard for people like myself, who want limited government, to get excited about the party. Worry about your superstitions at home, on your own time. Stop bringing that garbage to work. There are all kinds of problems facing our country and this clown takes the time to issue a statement regarding his disdain for secularism. If you want religion in government, move to Iran….jacka**. (MY CHANGE – NO CUSSING!)
3. I don’t understand DeMint’s comments about faith. While I am not against posting religious comments at the center, he does not tell the real truth. (Lady Has No Clue)
If you knew history you would know that Thomas Jefferson and most of the founding fathers wanted to keep religion out of the Constitution and the laws they made about this country. Thomas Jefferson was an atheist or agnostic. Check it out.
4. This statement is exactly why the Republican party lost so badly in the 2008 election. The current Republican party is infested with a Christian version of the Taliban seeking to force their religous beliefs onto the rest of the country. For a party that prides itself on being “conservative” and seeks to apoint Federal Judges who adhere to a STRICT interpretation of the Constitution, they always seem to ignore SEPERATION OF CHURCH AND STATE. Sen. DeMint should keep his faith where it belongs, in his Church on Sunday and in his private life.
http://briefingroom.thehill.com/2008/12/02/demint-capitol-visitor-center-fails-to-honor-faith/
Gas Prices Down, How to get it back up in the Back Rooms!
December 4, 2008
Gosh, and oil just wasn’t expensive enough to make everyone happy at $147 a barrel and $4 a gallon. Darn, the Congress’s coffers are leaner, Exxon won’t make another record quarter, OPEC can’t invest in ice skating rinks in the desert…but I bet the common man can buy a gallon of gas. Ain’t it a shame they can’t figure what really screwed the economy!
Steve
Gasoline Falls Below $1 a Gallon as Crude Oil Dips Under $44
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=email_en&refer=energy&sid=aIRxC_Hcq1BA
Gulf Oil CEO says gas could hit $1 next year
http://www.patriotledger.com/business/x1881115149/Gulf-Oil-CEO-says-lower-gas-prices-ahead
 Oil speculation is rampant, even as gas prices fall – Dec. 1, 2008*
Read ‘em and weep…it will come back if we start buying cars again…well, unless they’re high mileage cars. Let’s see how much they scream when they can’t keep building those islands in the UAR.
|
||
Now, yet another story why it is important to see whether or not his certificate is real: Steve
Supposed Conspiracy Claim Turns REAL on Obama
http://www.earthfrisk.com/blog/?p=135
It is becoming painfully obvious that we may very well have a criminal President in 2009. No this isn’t a joke. What I speak of is the curious developments in the supposedly racist, biased, dumb, as well as insane case of where Obama was born. Why the Barack Obama Birth Certificate Issue Is Legitimate
A strange development indeed is how it is that every time Barack Obama or a family member tells of where Obama was born, they seem to have no idea as of December 2008.
- They seemed to know what hospital quite a few times months ago when it was claimed that Obama’s mother gave birth to him at Queens Medical Center in Honolulu - Obama and Mom Never Here
The Queen’s Medical Center
1301 Punchbowl StreetHonolulu, HI 96813 Link to Site
Phone number 808-538-9011 General Medical Records 808-547-4361.After it was concluded that Obama and his mother were never there, his sister was in an interview (Mary) and claimed that Obama was born at Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children - Obama and Mom Never Here 1319 Punahou StreetHonolulu, Hawaii 96826(808) 535-7000 Link to site
Hospital after Hospital – all Have No Record of Obama being born or Mom Ever being There.
Hospital after hospital in Honolulu all have NO RECORD of Obama or mother ever being there. Is this some state secret? Are we to believe that even the hospital that he was born in should remain secret? Why lie to us as if it matters I mean the man did win the Presidential vote? Why the lies and secrecy?
We already know that Obama’s family and the entire nation of Kenya (which is about to have a national holiday for Obama) know that Barack Obama was born in Mombasa Coastal Hospital in Kenya. The government of Kenya has sealed these records. More and more secrecy due to the fact that once proven, Obama will not be constitutionally allowed to become President of the United States!
All of these were called or visited from November 20 – December 2nd 2008. It is confirmed, OBAMA not born in any hospital in Honolulu County! NONE FACT!
Hospital employees bribed, some gave info for free. All to be released on video shortly.Hospitals you can check yourself
- The Queen’s Medical Center - Honolulu, Hawaii Obama claims as his birth hospital
- Kapi’ olani Medical Center Obama’s sister claims Barack Obama born here
- Honolulu Shriners Hospital Never a patient Mom or Obama
- Straub Clinic & Hospital Never a patient Mom or Obama
- Hawaii Health Systems Corporation - Honolulu, Hawaii Never a patient Mom or Obama
- Cance r Institute of Maui - Wailuku, Hawaii No Comment ???
- Kuakini Hospital - Honolulu, Hawaii Never a patient Mom or Obama
- Rehabilitation Hospital of the Pacific - Honolulu, Hawaii Never a patient Mom or Obama
- St. Francis Healthcare System of Hawaii - Hawaii Never a patient Mom or Obama
- Straub Heatlh - Honolulu, Hawaii Never a patient Mom or Obama
- Tripler Medical Center - Honolulu, Hawaii Never a patient Mom or Obama
- Wahiawa General Hospital – Wahiawa, Hawaii Never a patient Mom or Obama
- Wilcox Memorial Hospital - Lihue, Kauai, Hawaii Never a patient Mom or Obama
We were pretty detailed in our calls and visits thanks to dozens of native Hawaiian patriots! To the College Republicans all over the Island kudos!. You can look atevery hospital here and call or visit any of them. Everyone has a family member working in a hospital. Talk, pay and bribe. You can file freedom of information acts, you can do everything and anything you wish. Barack Obama was never born in a hospital in Hawaii as claimed.
Only his original that he has sealed will have this info. Will the Supreme Court force it open and thus preserve the Constitution of the United States?
Why the Barack Obama Birth Certificate Issue Is Legitimate
Hawaii Issues Birth Certificates to Foreign Born Residents!
Here’s Hawaii saying it like it it. All Doubts Cleared my Friends.
- A. From Hawaii’s official Department of Health, Vital Records webpage: “Amended certificates of birth may be prepared and filed with the Department of Health, as provided by law, for 1) a person born in Hawaii who already has a birth certificate filed with the Department of Health or 2) a person born in a foreign country” (applies to adopted children).
- B. A parent may register an in-state birth in lieu of certification by a hospital of birth under HRS 338-5.
- C. Hawaiian law expressly provides for registration of out-of-state births underHRS 338-17.8. A foreign birth presumably would have been recorded by the American consular of the country of birth, and presumably that would be reflected on the Hawaiian birth certificate.
- D. Hawaiian law, however, expressly acknowledges that its system is subject to error. See, for example, HRS 338-17.
- E. Hawaiian law expressly provides for verification in lieu of certified copy of a birth certificate under HRS 338-14.3.
- F. Even the Hawaii Department of Home Lands does not accept a certified copy of a birth certificate as conclusive evidence for its homestead program. From itsweb site: “In order to process your application, DHHL utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL.”
- Now that we all understand that you can be born in Madagascar, Russia, Norway, Brazil or even Kenya like Obama and still have a REALbirth certificate that both Snopes and Factcheck would say was real since they are real. That doesn’t mean you were born in Hawaii. Does this matter to America?
- Barack Obama has as of November 27th 2008 spent over$500,000 U.S. to prevent others from seeing it. Why? Didn’t he already win the vote?
Please don’t bring up Snopes ( link) that says THEYVE SEEN Obama’s birth certificate and it is the one on his site called Fight the Smears. That is just plain garbage as it has a 2007 border and doesn’t list the hospital, Dr. or place of birth! Plus they say they’ve seen his real birth certificate (you know the one that we the people aren’t allowed to see) .
- All of the people born in Korea, Kenya, Mongolia, Australia and who also have Hawaiian birth certificates also have REAL birth certificates.
- This does not mean they were born in Hawaii. Get it?
The following is what Obama has on his site as his real birth certificate authenticated by Snopes and Factcheck. Hmmm – 2007 borders, no info on original at all? What’s wrong with this picture? Yes it is a real birth certificate, so are the tens of thousands of other birth certificates given to people born in other countries.
Please don’t bring up Fact Check either (link) as they and Snopes can literally LOOK AT the thousands and thousands of birth certificates in Hawaii from people born in Korea, Australia, Germany and even Kenya like Barack Obama! They are all REAL and Authentic birth certificates, but that doesn’t mean Barack Obama was born in Hawaii.
- Snopes and FactCheck aren’t lying when they say the 2007 birth certificate on Obama’s site is real. So are the thousands and thousands of birth certificates in Hawaii from people born in Korea, Australia, Germany and even Kenya like Barack Obama! They are all REAL and Authentic birth certificates, but that doesn’t mean they or Barack Obama was born in Hawaii. (Document currently on Obama’s site is a forgery though. I’m sure the Factcheck one that America may not see is real – just like all of the others?)
This is the whole point my friends. That is why many of us are incensed that Obama is about to become the President and may not even Constitutionally qualify to be one!
- This is unacceptable to every American who understands that Hawaii issues birth certificates to those born in foreign nations.
Yes – it is a proven fact that Hawaii grants birth certificates to people born in other nations! If you or I want a copy, they produce the document that you see on Obama’s site. That is NOT the one that has what we need to see to have Obama become President of the United States.
To become President of the United States one must meet 3 criteria.
- You must be 35 years of Age
- You must be a resident for 14 years
- You must be a natural born citizen – this is the one that someone born outside of the United States would obviously spend hundreds of thousands $$ to prevent us from seeing his birth certificate, just as Barack Obama has done. Hint Hint.
What is Barack Obama Hiding? Can anyone answer the question as to where and what hospital he was born in?
Time is ticking and it looks like all hope is on the Supreme Court on Friday when they review a case before them designed to force Obama to release his birth certificate. December 5th 2008 is the deadline for them to meet.
No One Checks these People’s backgrounds at all?
There is in fact NO ONE that checks. That is part of the lawsuits before the Supreme Court against the DNC as well as Obama. All they do is ask the state of birth if they have a real birth certificate on file and what the date of birth is. That is ALL! This is the whole point of the matter.
Other candidates for Presidency in 2008 NOT Qualified
We even had other candidates run for the Presidency in minor parties like this guy – who ran for President against Obama and McCain but WAS BORN IN NICARAGUA. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%B3ger_Calero
Understand that there is no one that makes sure like a national HR dept that candidates are qualified. Róger Calero was the Socialist Workers Party Candidate.He Ran and no one checked on his background either
Róger Calero was also arrested for felonies – another reason that he should not have even been allowed to even run for the Presidency in America. FACT. By the way he (Róger Calero) was on the ballot in five states, where he received 7,209 votes. Coupled with the 2,618 votes received in the five states where Harris was on the ballot, the Socialist Workers Party received 9,827 votes. No one checked his qualifications either. No one does!
We need to see Obama’s ’sealed’ birth certificate to clear all of the lies.
See: Shocker: Why Obama WILL NOT Be President in January
Also see
Unsafe Melamine Levels in Baby Formula-Posioning Your Babies
December 4, 2008
This is an unbelevable story here…to think the FDA would do this to babies…Melamine is a posion ….Melamine normal levels are .15 ppm (parts per million), but some of the tests showed 247 ppm which is 16x higher than can be explained by the equipment. So just two months ago the FDA said melamine is poison and not safe, but now since these tests they declare it so be safe even at these extremely high levels. So now the FDA declares 1 ppm to be a safe level of melamine when on their website earlier they said there wasn’t any safe level of melamine and they’ve NEVER done any tests. Now the FDA believes it can declare contaminants to be safe at a level it just invents on the spot, without conducting any science whatsoever.
Two months ago, U.S. regulators said they were unable to set a safety threshold for the chemical. But on Friday, just days after the Associated Press reported that the FDA found traces of melamine in infant formula made by one major U.S. manufacturer, the FDA set a safety threshold of 1 part per million in baby formula. (You can read about that here.)
The standard is the same as the one public health officials have set in Canada and China, but is 20 times higher than the most stringent level in Taiwan, the AP reports. The amount of melamine deemed safe in the U.S. is about 10,000 times lower than the amounts blamed for sickening children in China, which were as much as 2,500 parts per million, the AP reported.
The FDA found chemicals in the following U.S.-made formulas:
- Mead Johnson’s Infant Formula Powder, Enfamil LIPIL with Iron found melamine at levels of 0.137 and 0.14 parts per million.
- Three tests of Nestle’s Good Start Supreme Infant Formula with Iron detected an average of 0.247 parts per million of cyanuric acid.
Anyway here’s the article……………….
90 Percent of U.S. Infant Formula May Be Contaminated with Melamine; FDA Abruptly Declares Chemical Safe for Babies
(NaturalNews) Up to 90 percent of the infant formula sold in the United States may be contaminated with trace amounts of melamine, the toxic chemical linked to kidney damage, according to recent tests. The FDA’s test results, which the agency hid from the public and only released after the Associated Press filed a Freedom of Information Act request, showed that Nestle, Mead Johnson and Enfamil infant formula products were all contaminated with melamine.
The AP is also reporting that Abbott Laboratories conducted its own in-house tests that detected trace levels of melamine in its formula products. Together, these infant formula manufacturers make about 90 percent of the infant formula sold in the United States.
Prior to these test results being made public, the FDA had published a document on its website that explained there was no safe level of melamine contamination in infant formula. Specifically, the FDA stated, “FDA is currently unable to establish any level of melamine and melamine-related compounds in infant formula that does not raise public health concerns.”
Once tests found melamine in U.S.-made formula products, however, the FDA changed its story. As of today, the FDA has now officially declared melamine to be safe in infant formula as long as the contamination level is less than one part per million (1 ppm).
Astonishingly: The FDA has no new science to justify its abrupt decision declaring melamine to be safe!
Protecting Big Business instead of American babies
Rather than being based on science, the FDA’s decision appears to be based entirely on creating cover for U.S. infant formula manufacturers whose products were found to be contaminated with melamine. The “acceptable” level of contamination (1 ppm) is conveniently just above the levels found in U.S. infant formula products, thus placing U.S. infant formula in the “safe” contamination level category.
And yet the FDA has conducted no safety testing whatsoever to determine whether 1ppm of melamine is safe for infants to consume. There is no science involved in this decision whatsoever. Rather than this decision being based on science, the FDA is once again resorting to politically-motivated decisions that seek to protect the profits of Big Business rather than the safety of infants and children.
Recall that the FDA also recently declared Bisphenol-A to be safe for infants to consume, even while countries like Canada banned the chemical from baby bottles. The FDA, it seems has never met a corporate-sponsored chemical it didn’t like.
Where did the melamine come from?
Laughingly, the FDA claims the 1ppm of melamine in U.S. infant formula must have come from the manufacturing machines or food packaging equipment. And yet the AP is reporting that the expected level of melamine contamination from manufacturing equipment is only 15 ppb (parts per billion).
But the FDA’s own tests on Mead Johnson infant formula reveal it to contain 245 ppb, or 1600% more than what would be expected to exists due to melamine contamination from manufacturing equipment.
There are two really important questions that any intelligent consumer should be asking about all this:
Question #1) If the manufacturing and packaging equipment is contaminated with melamine, does this mean that ALL food products containing milk protein are similarly contaminated? The same companies that make infant formula also make Slim Fast, Ensure and Boost — all are milk protein-based meal replacement products containing many of the same ingredients as infant formula. Are they contaminated with melamine, too?
Question #2) If manufacturing and packaging machinery should only result in melamine contamination levels of 15 ppb, and yet 245 ppb were found in the infant formula, then where did all the extra melamine come from? The FDA has no explanation for this and seems to hope people will forget to ask.
Secret tests and public lies
There’s no doubt that these infant formula manufacturers are pursuing the very same contamination theories I’m describing here. They’re probably scrambling to test their milk protein sources, trying to figure out where all the extra melamine is coming from.
As usual, they’ll try to keep the test results secret, preventing this from exploding into a much larger public health issue. The FDA, for its part, will continue to conduct any actual science in secret, preventing the public from knowing the tests results unless it is sued by organizations like the AP.
That’s assuming the FDA conducts any science at all, because now the FDA believes it can declare contaminants to be safe at a level it just invents on the spot, without conducting any science whatsoever. The FDA is playing “Wheel of Fortune” with public safety (http://www.naturalnews.com/023681.html), and it’s relying on guessing games – rather than actual science – to declare safety levels of chemicals it doesn’t even understand.
The upshot of all this is really quite simple: People who feed their babies manufactured, mainstream infant formula products are fools! If there was ever a reason to breastfeed your baby, this is it. And if you’re looking for truly safe infant formula products, go with natural brands such as Genesis Organics Goat Milk Formula (www.GenesisOrganics.com) or other “natural” brands that don’t use cheap cow’s milk proteins.
After all, it’s quite clear at this point that the FDA doesn’t care about your baby’s health. You’re the only one who can protect your baby from melamine. The FDA flat out refuses to do so. In fact, it’s doing the opposite by declaring melamine to be safe!
So stop buying conventional infant formula products and start feeding your baby what it was meant to consume: Human breast milk from a healthy, well-nourished mom who eats lots of omega-3 oils and superfoods.
That’s the best infant formula in the world. And by the way, human babies shouldn’t be drinking bovine milk in the first place. The whole infant formula industry was a scam long before melamine came along. Now it’s a contaminated scam.
This is a long article, you can read it all at Natural news.com
Steve Hilton
babybttrfly
Mike