Here’s another short statement by my friend and retired Constitutional lawyer from Tennessee Publius Huldah on the Constitutional grounds for impeachment.
What are Grounds for IMPEACHMENT?
Folks, I clear up herein a widespread misconception about “impeachment”:
1. It isn’t necessary that the president, federal judges, etc. commit a felony before they may be impeached & removed. Alexander Hamilton points out in Federalist No. 66, 2nd para, that the president may be impeached & removed for encroachments, i.e., usurpations. Hamilton points out in Federalist No. 81 (8th para), that federal judges may be impeached & removed for usurpations.
2. Throughout the Federalist, it is stated that impeachment is for “political offenses”.
3. The House has the SOLE power of impeachment (Art. I, Sec. 2, last clause). The Senate has the SOLE power to try all impeachments (Art. I, Sec. 3, next to last clause). The decision to convict is not reviewable by any other body – and common sense tells us what that means! The House may impeach, and the Senate may convict, for any reason whatsoever; and their decision can not be overturned.
4. The language at Art. II, Sec. 4. about “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” is far broader than one might at first glance think. Somewhere I saw a scholarly paper showing that the “high” refers to the status of the official – it does not refer to the severity of the offense.
Now! Pay close attention: “Misdemeanor” has a much broader meaning than a lesser category of criminal offenses. Webster’s 1828 Dictionary shows the primary meaning of “misdemeanor” to be: “Ill behavior; evil conduct; fault; mismanagement.” This shows – proves – that a president, vice-president, and all civil Officers of the United States may be impeached, tried, convicted, and removed from office for “mismanagement”, etc.



Jul 26, 2010 @ 23:01:39
[ Webster’s 1828 Dictionary shows the primary meaning of “misdemeanor” to be: “Ill behavior; evil conduct; fault; mismanagement.” ]
I guess we should impeach nearly all the Republican Senators, then.
Jul 27, 2010 @ 09:18:22
Ha ha …..Ben…….yes both side could be included to one degree or the other that’s for sure……but in this article we’re talking about the president. But of course I don’t see it happening, but we can neutralize him in November and vote him out in 2012.
Jul 28, 2010 @ 12:06:09
It’s simple, vote for the “other guy” Make them all go home and start fresh. If that doesn’t work, vote for the next other guy. Eventually they’ll figure out they’re really not the ones that matter….