Well here is a modern day example of why the founding fathers wanted to separate themselves from the rulers in England and why they gave us a checks and balance system of government. This is why they limited the government power from Congress, the Courts and the Executive branch, so as to prevent this very thing from happening here in the US, but we are fast giving the Executive branch way too much power. Here’s what happened in Canada: The Canadian Parliament is only ceremonial…the Queen runs Canada….The parliament was moving to remove Steven Harper  the prime minister of Canada and the Queen stepped in because she likes what Harper has been doing and she froze parliament and if you read the legalese  parliament has been dissolved. She may reconfigure the parliament later, but because she disagreed with what was happening to Harper, she stopped it. This is how imperial rule works. I might add, the Queen could do this in Australia and around 20 other countries.

Canadian PM wins suspension of Parliament

OTTAWA (Reuters) – Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper won a rare suspension of Parliament on Thursday, managing to avoid being ousted by opposition parties angry over the minority Conservative government’s economic plans and an attempt to cut off party financing.

Governor General Michaelle Jeanthe representative of Queen Elizabeth, Canada’s head of stateagreed to Harper’s request to shut down Parliament until Jan 26. Parliament was reconvened just weeks ago after the October 14 election.

Harper’s request for suspension was unprecedented. No prime minister had asked for Parliament to be suspended to avoid a confidence vote in the House of Commons.(He knew he was about to be booted out, so he stopped it….a similar thing happen here in the US just weeks ago with Congress was going to vote against the Bailout bill, but in private many members were threatened with martial law if they didn’t pass it…..so they passed it. Here’s the audio from a radio interview with Senator James Inhofe)

Such a vote had been set for Monday and the Conservatives almost certainly would have lost it, and faced the possibility of being replaced by a coalition of opposition parties.

After a two-hour meeting with the governor general, Harper reaffirmed his promise to present a budget on Jan 27 and called on the opposition to work with the government over the next few weeks to tackle the effects of the global financial crisis.

“Today’s decision will give us an opportunity — and I’m talking about all the parties — to focus on the economy and to work together,” he told reporters.

The opposition Liberals, New Democrats and the separatist Bloc Quebecois — all to the left of the Conservatives — had signed a deal to defeat the Conservatives and put forward a Liberal-New Democrat coalition to form a new government.

The Bloc, which wants to take French-speaking Quebec out of Canada, pledged to back the coalition’s budgets and general policy direction.

The governor general’s role in government, as representative of the Crown, is largely ceremonial,(this time is wasn’t ceremonial…she showed her authority) though she has the final word on constitutional matters. Should the government be defeated in a confidence vote, she would decide whether to call a new election or allow the opposition to form a coalition government.


Harper’s gambit was the latest development in a constitutional battle that erupted last week after he tried to eliminate direct subsidies of political parties, a move that would have hit the opposition particularly hard.

He backed down on that, but the opposition parties also say they are upset that the government has not dealt adequately with the economic crisis and said it had lost the confidence of the House of Commons.

Liberal leader Stephane Dion, who would have become prime minister under the opposition’s coalition plan, said nothing he heard from Harper on Thursday had changed his mind about trying to bring down the government.

However, he did appear to open the door a crack to not proceeding with such a plan.

“This is about replacing Stephen Harper unless he made a monumental change,” he told a news conference. “It means a recovery plan, a real recovery plan.”

Read the entire article @ Reuters.com