UPDATED: NBC’s Bob Costas Blames NFL Murder-Suicide On Guns


Bob Costas, discussing the murder-suicide of NFL’s Jovan Belcher, went on a gun rant during halftime of NBC’s Sunday Night Football for gun control. How’s that gun control working for you in Chicago. Sad to use a tragedy to advance ones own agenda.

Ted Nugent said “Bob Costas is Dead Wrong” published in the Washington Times last Thursday, saying, “If there were a free speech penalty for blundering ignorance, a penalty flag would have been tossed at Mr. Costas.”

Costas also, Nugent argues, willfully ignores the countless times an NFL player’s death was caused by something other than guns, demonstrating the gun-grabber’s glaring hypocrisy:

“What Mr. Costas didn’t say and possibly doesn’t know is that 2 million Americans use guns each year to defend themselves from punks and thugs. Access to guns saves an incalculable number of lives each year. How about that, Mr. Costas?”

“Just a few years ago, a drunk NFL football player ran over a guy and killed him. As I recall, the player paid off the family of the deceased and only did 30 days in the slammer. Where was Mr. Costas on this? Did he opine that easy access to alcohol and automobiles was responsible for this death? To those liberals who want to restrict or ban access to guns, do you also support banning booze because drunks kill roughly 12,000 Americans each year in drinking-and-driving slaughters?”

Nugent concludes with a recommendation to “not trust any fuzzy-headed goofball” using “liberal fairyland pseudologic.”

“We have more than enough gun laws in America. Another law or restriction would not have prevented the Kansas City Chief murderer from killing his girlfriend or himself. That’s the ugly reality that Mr. Costas obviously refuses to embrace.”

After a firestorm of criticism, Costas, rather than recall his statements, instead showed up on MSNBC’s The Last Word with Chris O’Donnell defending his unmistakable attack on the Second Amendment, pointing out that “65 out of 80 Colts players admitted to owning guns” and that “Even if all those guns were obtained legally, you can’t have 65 guys in their 20′s and 30′s, aggressive young men subject to impulses, without something bad happening.” NBC Sports broadcaster Costas claims there are no examples of athletes using guns to neutralize dangerous situations.

Nugent recently found himself in a Secret Service “stranglehold” after he compared the Obama administration and Democrats to a coyote that’s broken into your living room: “It’s good people who bent over and let the enemy in. If the coyote’s in your living room pissing on your couch, it’s not the coyote’s fault. It’s your fault for not shooting him.” Days later he was cleared of any wrongdoing.

NewsBusters reported Saturday the tragic murder-suicide involving a Kansas City Chiefs’ football player and his girlfriend.

During halftime of NBC’s Sunday Night Football, Bob Costas chose to lecture America about how guns were to blame for the incident concluding, “If Jovan Belcher didn’t possess a gun, he and Kasandra Perkins would both be alive today” (video follows with transcript and

Read more


It Starts-159 New IRS Rules Meant to Help Fund Obamacare

Comments Off on It Starts-159 New IRS Rules Meant to Help Fund Obamacare

The Internal Revenue Service has released new rules for investment income taxes on capital gains and dividends earned by high-income individuals that passed Congress as part of the 2010 healthcare reform law.

The 3.8 percent surtax on investment income, meant to help pay for healthcare, goes into effect in 2013. It is the first surtax to be applied to capital gains and dividend income.

The tax affects only individuals with more than $200,000 in modified adjusted gross income (MAGI), and married couples filing jointly with more than $250,000 of MAGI.

The tax applies to a broad range of investment securities ranging from stocks and bonds to commodity securities and specialized derivatives.

The 159 pages of rules spell out when the tax applies to trusts and annuities, as well as to individual securities traders.


Released late on Friday, the new regulations include a 0.9 percent healthcare tax on wages for high-income individuals.

Both sets of rules will be published on Wednesday in the Federal Register.

The proposed rules are effective starting January 1. Before making the rules final, the IRS will take public comments and hold hearings in April.

Together, the two taxes are estimated to raise $317.7 billion over 10 years, according to a Joint Committee on Taxation analysis released in June.

Continue reading

Why Tennessee needs its own health insurance exchange or Does it

Comments Off on Why Tennessee needs its own health insurance exchange or Does it

Healthcare policy experts have estimated that former senator Dr. Bill Frist’s company HCA stands to make $2 billion if an Obamacare Exchange is established in Tennessee.

Is it any wonder he is pushing Gov. Haslam and our legislators to implement a health care exchange in Tennessee?  I thought we voted in the Tennessee Healthcare Freedom Act so the state AG would defend anyone not buying the mandated healthcare plan? Now we are about to set up an exchange?

What’s that giant sucking sound? It’s the sound of employers leaving Tennessee if Gov. Haslam implements the Obamacare exchanges.

Contact Gov. Haslam and your legislators now!

(615) 741-2001

Find your legislator – http://www.capitol.tn.gov/legislators/

Thousands of Tennesseans are weighing in on the issue. Gov. Bill Haslam’s staff said they have received some 4,000 emails and 2,000 phone calls about insurance exchanges.

While staff didn’t break down the email messages to pros and cons, almost all of the phone calls were urging the governor to say “no Obamacare in Tennessee” — a decision that is out of the state’s hands — or ditch the exchange and let the federal government handle it.

Of the rest, about 75 said they were in favor of a state exchange. Another 32 spoke out against the state running it, but changed their stance after the choices were explained, according to the governor’s constituent services staff.

Here is his article published on Sunday in the Commerical Appeal. Biased much?

By Dr. Manoj Jain and Dr. William H. Frist

Nashville: The ball is in our court.

By “our court” we mean the State of Tennessee, and the ball is the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, which has been volleyed at the federal level between Congress, the Supreme Court and the presidential election.

Now Gov. Bill Haslam and the General Assembly will decide on two critical questions that will shape health care for our state.

First, should Tennessee develop its own insurance exchange, and second, should Tennessee expand the Medicaid program with federal funding.

This week, we will address the question of exchanges.

A ‘one-stop’ shop

A few days ago a friend, Willy, who has a modest income and underlying heart disease called for some advice. “How do I choose which health insurance plan to get?” The answer is hard. Today, there are many products offering different health benefits with varying costs and no easy way to compare them. With Willy’s pre-existing illness, insurers may even deny him coverage.

Soon, however, insurers will be barred from turning people down due to health conditions and health insurance will become standardized through an exchange. Insurance also will become more accessible, especially for those earning less than about $90,000 (400 percent of the poverty level), who will get federal tax credits to lower the cost, while others will continue with their Medicare, employer-based or private health coverage.

An exchange is essentially a one-stop shop of health care plans which will be available online or on a toll-free call. Consumers can decide among different categories of health insurance called platinum, gold, silver and bronze, based on benefit categories. A bronze plan would cover 60 percent of the cost of the plan’s benefits on average while the platinum plan would cover 90 percent.

All plans will provide the same essential health benefits like hospitalizations and preventive and wellness services which will be defined by the state under federal guidelines. Out-of-pocket and Health Savings Account limits will vary among plans. In addition, exchanges will include a catastrophic plan for those who are younger than 30 years and are exempt from the insurance mandate.

Exchanges will serve both individuals and small businesses with 100 or fewer employees. States can lower the 100 limit to 50 in the first few years, and pretty much every state is doing that. By 2017, if Tennessee chooses, larger businesses may be allowed to purchase insurance from the small business exchange.

State exchanges will have lots of authority. Though they will not be setting the insurance rates, they can bar an insurer from an exchange for raising its rates too high. The exchanges will also determine the eligibility of an individual, such as Willie, for purchasing insurance as well as how much premium support and tax credit he will receive to help him afford insurance, paid for by the federal government, based on his income. An exchange can be an active purchaser choosing plans with good rates or a clearinghouse, allowing in all qualified plans. Tennessee will need to choose which model it wants.

The option for Tennessee is not whether to have an exchange; it must do so under the new law. The option is whether Tennessee should craft its own exchange or default to the federal exchange.

We believe it is best for Tennessee to develop its own exchange because exchanges are an innovative, market-driven strategy, which foster competition, choice, cost-savings and quality among insurers. It leaves Tennessee in charge, and not the federal government.

The state in charge

Why would a Tennessee exchange be better than the federal exchange?

Traditionally, insurance regulation has been under the authority of the states and states have much more expertise than the federal government in this field. Exchanges also represent the federalist ideal of states as “laboratories for democracy” where states can design a model that takes into account their individual cultures, politics, economies, and demographics.

Utah has a conservative, small business focused exchange. Vermont is moving toward a liberal single-payer exchange, Green Mountain Care, offering care to all its residents. Tennessee’s exchange, if we choose to have one, will likely be somewhere in between, and will merge well with our existing Medicaid plan, TennCare.

Continue reading

For more reading: