Okay so when government workers saw that they could lessen the pain of the sequester they get a memo ordering them not to do it: We told them it would be devastating so make it devastating. Don’t make it look like we are contradicted ourselves.
One commentor says:
This is no surprise to anyone familiar with Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals ~ create chaos, then isolate, demonize and blame your opponent for the chaos. How to spark unrest and revolution. This was all known in 2007 to be his methodology yet we chose to elect him~ now like Paul in the stormy boat we need to provide some kind of solutions.
The Obama administration denied an appeal for flexibility in lessening the sequester’s effects, with an email this week appearing to show officials in Washington that because they already had promised the cuts would be devastating, they now have to follow through on that.
In the email sent Monday by Charles Brown, an official with the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service office in Raleigh, N.C., Mr. Brown asked “if there was any latitude” in how to spread the sequester cuts across the region to lessen the impacts on fish inspections.
APHIS is an agency within the Agriculture Department, and on Tuesday department Secretary Tom Vilsack was challenged on the email at a House committee hearing by Rep. Kristi Noem, who said she hoped the department wouldn’t tie agencies’ hands.
Mr. Vilsack said he hadn’t seen the email, but said agencies are supposed to be trying to find ways to manage the impact of the cuts.