As Senators line up to help the background check “compromise” clear its first procedural hurdle, it’s important to remember this measure will have absolutely no affect on decreasing public shootings, reducing violent crime, or improving the safety of children who are sitting in gun free zones.

That’s because expanded background checks are about gun control rather than stopping the next Sandy Hook-style shooting. (And Confiscation later I might add)

Republicans, their constituents, and Democrat Senators in red states who are up for re-election in 2014 need to ask themselves these questions:

1. Would expanded background checks have stopped Adam Lanza from doing what he did on Dec. 14, 2012?

2. Would expanded background checks have at least hindered or slowed what he did?

3. Why are President Obama, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV), Senator Pat Toomey (R-PA), and NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg pushing expanded background checks at this moment?

Answers: no, no, and “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.

Background checks are already in place and have been since 1998but Adam Lanza went around them by stealing his guns. What is accomplished by expanding background checks that criminals will continue to avoid? The only thing that is accomplished is an incremental increase of more gun control on law-abiding citizens.(Not the criminals!!!)

This is why Obama’s January announcement of a push for expanded background checks was even greeted with doubt and skepticism by The New York Times, which was quick to point out that expanded background checks would have “done little to prevent to massacre in Newtown.”

Make no mistake, expanded background checks are about gun control, not preventing the next Sandy Hook.

Breitbart

See how upset people are by the comments on that page, here’s a few:

  • KJinAZ2 hours ago

    The goals of the Progressive left has NOTHING to do with controlling violence. The are affraid of citizen’s who will fight back against their TYRANNY.

    They are pushing the call to arms closer every day.

  • miller122 hours ago

    Compromise is liberal code word for Republican surrender.

  • garyinaz662 hours ago

    the 16 Republicans who believe the 2nd amendment should get an up or down vote on the Senate floor:

    The 16 GOP senators that voted to end debate were:
    Lamar Alexander of Tennessee;Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire;Richard Burr of North Carolina;Saxby Chambliss of Georgia;Tom Coburn of Oklahoma;Susan Collins of Maine;
    Bob Corker of Tennessee;Jeff Flake of Arizona;Lindsey Graham of South Carolina;John Hoeven of North Dakota;Johnny Isakson of Georgia;Dean Heller of Nevada;Mark Kirk of Illinois;John McCain of Arizona;Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania;Roger Wicker of Mississippi.

    they prevented the republicans from being able to filibuster. hard to believe my state of Arizona has two of the most liberal members of the senate😦

  • SigFan2 hours ago

    But, but, but – it’s for the children!

    Nothing but another step toward the left’s stated goal – a disarmed and helpless public.