COMMUNIST RULES FOR REVOLUTION

Comments Off on COMMUNIST RULES FOR REVOLUTION

This article was captured in Dusseldorf, Germany, May 1919 by the Allied forces. No doubt, many of you have seen this before but I thought that it would be well to publish this again so that we could work and pray for the defeat of this revolution that it appears they’re trying so hard to put into effect this year of 2013. When I say they I’m speaking also about the UN, which I think is behind all of this as much as anyone else. Everyone should study this carefully and then work with others to help defeat it. The reason I am posting this is for people to read the list and then compare it to what has happened and is happening in the United States today.

 

Communist Rules for Revolution:

A. Corrupt the young; get them away from religion. Get them interested

in sex. Make them superficial; destroy their ruggedness.
B. Get control of all means of publicity, thereby:

1. Get people’s minds off their government by focusing their attention

on athletics, sexy books and plays and other trivialities.

2. Divide the people into hostile groups by constantly harping on

controversial matters of no importance.

3. Destroy the people’s faith in their natural leaders by holding them up

to contempt and ridicule.

4. Always preach true democracy, but seize power as fast and as

ruthlessly as possible.

5. By encouraging Government extravagance, destroy its credits,

produce fear of inflation with rising prices and general discontent.

6. Promote unnecessary strikes in vital industry, encourage civil

disorders and foster a lenient and soft attitude on the part of the

government toward such disorders.

7. By specious [fair-seeming but deceptive] argument, cause the

breakdown of old moral virtues, honesty and sobriety.
C. Cause the restriction of all firearms on some pretext with a view of

confiscating them and leaving the population helpless later.

 

Advertisements

Middle East a “Bump In The Road”?

Comments Off on Middle East a “Bump In The Road”?

Well, if insulting Israel wasn’t enough, now Obama chooses to insult the intelligence of the US citizenry and call what’s happened in the Middle East and North Africa a “bump in the road”. Really? Murder is a bump in the road? From the Mail online…

President Barack Obama referred to recent events in the Middle East, including violent attacks on embassies and the terrorist murder of a US ambassador and three other Americans, as ‘bumps in the road’.

The comment came in Obama’s CBS ’60 Minutes’ interview that aired on Sunday night. 

Steve Kroft, the interviewer, asked: ‘Have the events that took place in the Middle East, the recent events in the Middle East given you any pause about your support for the governments that have come to power following the Arab Spring?

Obama responded: ‘Well, I’d said even at the time that this is going to be a rocky path. The question presumes that somehow we could have stopped this wave of change. 

 

 
oba
akdkdo
 

Bumps in the road: The President said the killing of ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans in Libya was some of the ‘bumps in the road’ along the ‘rocky path’ to Middle Eastern peace

 

 

 

 
asdasdfTerror attack: It took the White House some days to admit the sacking of the consulate in Benghazi was pre-planned

 

 

‘I think it was absolutely the right thing for us to do to align ourselves with democracy, universal rights — a notion that people have to be able to participate in their own governance. 

‘But I was pretty certain and continue to be pretty certain that there are going to be bumps in the road because, you know, in a lot of these places, the one organizing principle has been Islam.’  

Ambassador Chris Stevens died of apparent asphyxiation at the U.S. consulate in Benghazi after an attack launched under the cover of a demonstration against a crude, low-budget anti-Islam movie mad ein California.

Sean Smith, another diplomat, and former U.S. Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods were also killed.

Republicans leapt on Obama’s ‘bumps in the road’ comment. Ari Fleischer, former press secretary to President George W. Bush said on Twitter: ‘I guess when u win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing nothing “an attack that kills an Ambassador is just a ‘bump in the road.’

 

 
asdasfasdfCriticism: Obama faced anger from those who saw his ‘bumps in the road’ comment as too dismissive

 

 

The Obama administration initially insisted the attack was a spontaneous result of anger about the movie and had nothing to do with al-Qaeda or U.S. policy in the region.

After the head of the U.S. National Counterterrorism Centre told Congress the attack was terrorism, Obama’s spokesman Jay Carney then stated: ‘It is, I think, self-evident that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack.

‘Our embassy was attacked violently and the result was four deaths of American officials.’

On the same day as the five-hour Benghazi consulate attack, in which RPGs and mortars were used, the U.S. embassy in Cairo was targeted by a mob that tore down the American flag and replaced it with a black Islamic flag.

There were also attacks on U.S. missions in Tunis, Sana’a, Khartoum and Islamabad.

Stevens, the first U.S. ambassador to be murdered since 1979, was a fluent Arabic and French speaker widely viewed as one of the greatest American diplomatic assets in the region. 

A diary written by Stevens and obtained by CNN after being found in the wreckage of the Benghazi consulate revealed that he had been concerned about security threats in the city and a rise in Islamic extremism.

A White House official firmly rejecetd this, telling ABC News: ‘It’s just not true that he was characterising the attack in Benghazi – the question doesn’t even make mention of it. He’s speaking about broad trends.’

Gay Marriage Now in The DNC Platform

Comments Off on Gay Marriage Now in The DNC Platform

Well, Barack Obama started the firestorm, and the DNC jumped in the flames…here it is, the official platform of the Democratic Party now includes Gay Marriage…this article from the Politico…

By REID J. EPSTEIN and BYRON TAU

Democrats are set to include a pro-gay marriage plank in their convention platform for the first time in history, party sources confirm to POLITICO. The language was approved unanimously by a 15-member platform draft committee, and now heads for approval by the full platform committee in August.

The party’s Platform Drafting Committee agreed, unanimously, to approve the language at a meeting this weekend in Minneapolis.

A source in the meeting said the decision was “not controversial.”

The language will not become official until the party’s full Platform Committee meets Aug. 10 in Detroit.

The effort to include gay marriage in the platform gained increased momentum after President Barack Obama announced in May that his views on the issue had changed to support legalization.

“I don’t think that we had any issues that were controversial,” one member of the committee said Monday. “I think we were pretty much in sync and in agreement with where we ended up.”

White House spokesman Josh Earnest on Monday referred questions about the platform to the Democratic National Committee. A DNC spokesperson declined to comment on what the official described as ongoing process.

The decision was first reported Monday by the Washington Blade, to whom Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) confirmed the news.

A draft plank circulated in February — before the president’s endorsement — read: “We support the full inclusion of all families in the life of our nation, with equal respect, responsibilities, and protections under the law, including the freedom to marry. Government has no business putting barriers in the path of people seeking to care for their family members, particularly in challenging economic times. We support the Respect for Marriage Act and the overturning of the federal so-called Defense of Marriage Act, and oppose discriminatory constitutional amendments and other attempts to deny the freedom to marry to loving and committed same-sex couples.”

It is unclear whether the Democrats have strengthened the language in the wake of Obama’s endorsement of same-sex marriage. The DNC declined to comment on an ongoing process, and outside witnesses at the platform hearing were not provided with draft text.

“We’ve not seen any specific language at this point,” Zeke Stokes, a spokesman for Servicemembers Legal Defense Network said. SLDN put forward a witness at last week’s hearing testifying in favor of the plank.

But the news was quickly applauded by Marc Solomon, National Campaign Director of Freedom to Marry.

“We are proud that the Committee is including language that will ensure the Party is leading the way forward in supporting marriage for loving and committed same-sex couples and their families,” Solomon said in a statement.

Could This Be the Forewarn to Civil Unrest and Martial Law?

Comments Off on Could This Be the Forewarn to Civil Unrest and Martial Law?

Are you ready for a rocky election? Hope so, DHS is…

 

DHS gears up for civil unrest prior to presidential elections

 
Reuters / Frank Polich

Reuters / Frank Polich

The Department of Homeland Security has ordered masses of riot gear equipment to prepare for potential significant domestic riots at the Republican National Convention, Democratic National Convention and next year’s presidential inauguration.

The DHS submitted a rushed solicitation to the Federal Business Opportunities site on Wednesday, which is a portal for Federal government procurement requisitions over $25,000. The request gave the potential suppliers only one day to submit their proposals and a 15-day delivery requirement to Alexandria, Virginia.

As the brief explains, “the objective of this effort is to procure riot gear to prepare for the 2012 Democratic and Republican National Conventions, the 2013 Presidential Inauguration and other future similar activities.”

The total amount ordered is about 150 sets of riot helmets, thigh and groin protectors, hard-shell shin guards and other riot gear.

Specifically, DHS is looking to obtain:

– “147 riot helmets” with “adjustable tactical face shield with liquid seal”

 “147 sets of upper body and shoulder protection”

– “152 sets of thigh and groin protection”

– “147 hard-shell shin guards” with “substantial protection from flying debris, non-ballistic weapons, and blows to the leg” and “optimized protective design for severe riot control or tactical situations.”

– “156 forearm protectors”

– “147 pairs of tactical gloves”

The riot gear will be worn by Federal Protective Service agents who are tasked with protecting property, grounds and buildings owned by the federal government.

The urgency of the order can be explained by the fact that there is a growing anticipation that many demonstrators will travel to the Republican National Convention (RNC), scheduled for August 27-30 in Tampa Bay, Florida, and Democratic National Convention (DNC), planned for September 3-6 in Charlotte, North Carolina.

The RNC itself, for example, will have free speech zones, which will serve as containment quarters for the protesters by not allowing them to leave the designated areas and cause trouble.

Another recent DHS move to gear up was back in March of this year, when it gave the defense contractor ATK a deal to provide the DHS with 450 million .40 caliber hollow-point ammunition over a five year period.

On top of that, the DHS has recently purchased a number of bullet-proof checkpoint booths and hired hundreds of new security guards to protect government buildings.

 

White on Black, Black on White?

Comments Off on White on Black, Black on White?

Normally, I try to leave racial stories alone, but this time the president tagged it…”if I had a son, he’d be like Trayvon”. Well, take a look. The story may not be what it seems, plus, why does this story get the national attention it has? Why is it that the president called his mother and made that kind of statement? The story is a little different, according to snopes, nevertheless, it is a true story, but the headlines barely got out of the mid-South in 2007. Where was Barack Obama, and why didn’t he call the parents of these innocent children? It would have been good, since he was campaigning for “change”. It’s hard not to see which side his bread is buttered on, maybe he should have called them up for a beer summit. I will, however post my friend Carl’s email for asking the question that prompted this post. While I want to be fair, I will post the link for snopes. The story changes a little, and there is an attempt at justifying it at the end with OJ trial. Even snopes doesn’t get this one. These are both racially motivated, you just have to question which is worse…

http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/newsom.asp

 

Recently we’ve been bombarded with hourly rants about the heinous, RACIST nature of the incident in Florida where a neighborhood vigilante allegedly “chased down, confronted and murdered” a young black man who was “simply going to the store for snacks.” I don’t know if the allegations are true or not, and I trust the appropriate authorities in Florida will sort it out.

However, the media coverage given to this alleged crime is simply over the top, in my estimation. White (and is it just me? – I think the shooter looks very hispanic) on black violence provokes terrific response from the black community, aided, abetted, encouraged and inflamed by the national media to such an extent that riots and black vigilantism is not only a strong possibility, but a near certainty if the shooter isn’t convicted and executed forthwith.

I want to know where the balance is. Why isn’t black on white crime – especially heinous crime – given the same attention by the national media? They seem to simply note and accept terrible crime perpetrated by black thugs against white victims as simply ho-hum normal. “Move along folks, nothing to see here…” Exactly what should white America take away from that attitude by the national media? Aren’t the lives of innocent white people as important as those of innocent black people? Really… ???

We see instances of wilding against white female joggers by gangs of black thugs and nothing much is said about it on national media. We see horrific, murderous crime against innocent white people by black thugs and nothing much is said about it on national media. Evidently white lives and white dignity are not as important as black lives and dignity to the mainstream national media. Something is very wrong with that picture. Balance is simply not there.

A few years ago, a particularly heinous crime was carried out against two innocent white kids by five black thugs in Knoxville, Tennessee, resulting in the white kids’ prolonged, agonizing and humiliating deaths. They were tortured over a period of four days before they were “allowed” to finally die. They were both raped repeatedly. He had his penis removed while still alive, and she was forced to drink caustic liquids – bleach – to mask the evidence of sexual assault, then partially dismembered while still alive. I expect death must have come as a relief to those two innocents.

It doesn’t get much more heinous than that. But very few people in the country knew about that crime when it happened and it’s nearly forgotten now. It’s mostly well known in the Knoxville area only. The national media didn’t give it more than momentary lip service and it was old news in a hurry. How is that balanced against the hourly rant for Zimmerman’s blood in Florida these days, before the guy is even charged. The New Black Panthers, with a national media blessing, even has a bounty out for Zimmerman’s head.

Where is the balance?? We certainly did NOT see white people (except the Nazis) demonstrating in the street for these black thugs’ blood in Knoxville – and certainly not anywhere else in the country. But then, the national media didn’t report hourly on the crime either. The must not have thought it very newsworthy. They pretty much ignored it because it was a black on white atrocity, not the other way round..

David Plouffe…”Reprehensible.” “Irresponsible.” “Hard to stomach.”

Comments Off on David Plouffe…”Reprehensible.” “Irresponsible.” “Hard to stomach.”

I love a good political spin. If you saw Obama make this statement, and you also know that his administration backed the OWS, then you can see how one sided this really is. They have lost a lot of the independent vote, and the only way to get attention now is flip the race card and create more class warfare. Gingrich and Santorum are on point on this one.  Let’s just see if those words fit the Obama campaign this summer…

Washington (CNN) Gabriella Schwarz 

 “Reprehensible.” “Irresponsible.” “Hard to stomach.”

White House senior adviser David Plouffe did not mince words Sunday when talking about the reaction by Republican presidential candidates Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich to President Barack Obama’s comments on the Trayvon Martin shooting.

“Those two comments are really irresponsible. I would consider them reprehensible,” Plouffe said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “I think those comments were really hard to stomach, really, and I guess trying to appeal to people’s worst instincts.”

While the GOP presidential candidates said the incident was a tragedy, Santorum and Gingrich were particularly critical of the president’s response to the shooting in which Martin, an unarmed 17-year-old, was shot and killed by a George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer. Zimmerman claimed he shot Martin in self-defense.

A somber Obama on Friday commiserated with the Martin family and urged authorities to fully investigate the shooting.

“If I had a son he would look like Trayvon,” Obama said. “I think (his parents) are right to expect that all of us as Americans are going to take this with the seriousness it deserves and we will get to the bottom of exactly what happened.”

Santorum said the president politicized the events, while Gingrich characterized Obama’s comments as “nonsense.”

“What the president of the United States should do is try to bring people together, not use these types of horrible and tragic individual cases to try to drive a wedge in America,” Santorum said Friday on “The Hugh Hewitt Show,” a radio program.

“Is the president suggesting if it had been a white who had been shot, that would be OK because it wouldn’t look like him? That’s just nonsense,” Gingrich said Friday on conservative host Sean Hannity’s radio show, “The Hannity Show.” “I mean dividing this country up, it is a tragedy this young man was shot.”

But Plouffe, who served as Obama’s 2008 campaign manager, said the Republican reaction is evidence of a circus-like primary.

“I don’t think there’s very many people in America that would share that reaction. You know, this Republican primary at some points has been more of a circus show and a clown show,” Plouffe told CNN Chief Political Correspondent Candy Crowley.

Although he indicated the Obama campaign expects Romney to be the Republican nominee, Plouffe also predicted an aggressive election come fall.

“Romney has a big delegate lead so we’ve always felt you know because Romney’s won a couple of big states lately, the fundamentals kind of support him,” Plouffe said. “But it’s going to be a close competitive race no matter who come out the other side.”

To The Republican National Committee…Republican Party Generally

Comments Off on To The Republican National Committee…Republican Party Generally

In response to my third Republican survey, I decided to enclose my comments. I want to share them with you. Somehow, they don’t get it.

To the Republican National Convention:

First, I’m hoping someone actually reads this instead of just processing the survey form. I was going to help try and elect our President this year, but it’s hard for me to send money to an organization that attacks it’s candidates and attempts to choose a front runner even prior to the primaries that choose him or her.

I want to add to this “prepared” survey. This is the same stuff that comes out at every election period, except this printing says “Obama”. He is an embarrassment to the United States of America, and all effort should be done to defeat him this election cycle because the Republican establishment refuses to stop him.

Our conservatives aren’t so conservative anymore. You are mistaken to support Mitt Romney as a conservative, even more so to claim to be a conservative and put support behind him. For that alone, I cannot support the Republican party if that money goes to support him. As much as I abhor the thought of it, I will vote for him over Obama, but it’s another situation of the lesser of two evils.

`The answer to question #1, “Are Obama’s concerns the best interest of Americans” was enough to cause me to vote Republican in itself. I am not a Republican; I am a member of the Constitution party. I believe in the Constitution as the authority for everything that happens in Washington, D. C. As much as I feel that president Obama has violated the oath that he took to uphold it and has committed acts against it, I also feel that congress has done the same by not bringing articles of impeachment against him.

All of the questions you pose in the survey have been part of a conservative platform since the days of Barry Goldwater. We have too many “closet” conservatives in DC now, those who promise and then when they arrive in the beltway, falter. They need to be removed, re-educated, or expunged. One way to do that…term limits. If it’s an advantage that the president only serves 2 terms, it’s stands to reason that 30 plus years in the congress is too much.

I added, “quit competing and work together” at the end of question 2. That applies within and without. If Republicans can’t get along for the good of the country, then what should we expect from the other side? You don’t have to agree with Democrats and Independents, but past presidents and leaders of the Congress have found workable ground. This country is gridlocked, and unless things improve, I see stirrings of civil war. That isn’t good. It comes from real Patriots who want America to remain the largest superpower and keep that position in the world. Equality with China and Russia doesn’t sound good. Right now, we’re more like the world’s clowns.

I was happy to watch the gavel being handed to Speaker Boehner – and I thought it was going to get better. Nancy Pelosi, in all her arrogance, spent hours in front of TV cameras daring America and congress to challenge her authority. Now that Republicans are in control of the House, she’s still doing it. She still predicts she will regain the gavel. Why doesn’t Speaker Boehner challenge liberal, Democratic arrogance? Why aren’t impeachment hearings being scheduled for Obama and his cronies? Why is Eric Holder allowed to spit on the law? Congress might look up the definition the founders had for impeachment – they have crossed way over that line.

I’m tired of polls asking what I already know, and keep bringing up the same points over and over again. I want our politicians to become statesmen. A statesman isn’t worried about his political future. He or she isn’t worried about angering the opposition. His or her concern is America and how to strengthen her. Instead, right now we have a bunch of stuffed shirts who worry more about their stature and impression of their peers rather than what their constituents want. Barack Obama has not helped the economic landscape of America since he has been in office, but he certainly didn’t cause the downslide. How many years has our government been caustic to manufacturing and production in the US? How supportive has our government been to overseas labor and unbalanced trade practices?

Don’t blame it all on Obama, it started a long time ago. Conservatism- it’s been a lost cause in the US government for decades. I’m not a believer of total isolationism, but I am for protecting US economic priorities as far as US hands making US products to sell to US people – first!

I believe in taking care of our military, our poor, our elderly and our retirees. Where have your priorities been? It’s not up to America to shore up other countries. It certainly isn’t theirs and has never been. Sure, we can help others, when we’re back in the position to be helping. When we do, we should remember what it was like to give away the farm.

You asked about values. Our country hasn’t been concerned about them. It’s been totally concerned about political correctness. This country was founded in religious morality. Argue as you will whether or not our founders were Christians. Argue whether or not Thomas Jefferson meant that “separation of church and state” mean whitewashing religious and moral values from the decisions of its leaders. What you can’t argue is that since that question has been negated to removing all mentions of moral guidance and religious values, this government has done more to damage the intent of the framers than any in history. We have a more immoral, unforgiving, entitlement craving, unethical and close-minded society than ever. Why is that? Could it be because we’ve lowered the bar and accepted less than what this country was built upon and intended to remain strong because of? Instead of becoming a stronger society, we’re becoming a more divided society. We don’t hold American ideals sacred, we’re hyphen Americans.

I am unemployed because of this economic situation. I have been now for six months, and there seems to be nothing in sight for employment in my area. I am facing the possibility of selling my home and moving to find better opportunity. I am over 55 years of age and didn’t think I would be in this position late in life. I have a formal education, and have been a mid-level executive for 20 plus years, but yet I cannot market myself and find employment. I have exhausted my savings and am worried. How excited do you think I feel about supporting more of the same government by the party who has spewed “fake” conservatism since the days of Ronald Reagan?

I want to feel positive about America. I love her, and I am proud to be an American. I am proud of her history, and my family has fought for her freedoms. What I’m not proud of is a government that won’t police itself on the values of the constitution and call out those who stain and disregard its authority. No matter how big a politician or a party feels they are, the constitution and its values are bigger.

Here’s where you need to concentrate. Read your own questions. You already know where the Republican Party should be or you wouldn’t be asking the same questions again. Liberals have not asked anyone whether or not they should push their agenda. It’s now at a fighting stage. In all surveys I have seen, in all programs I have listened to, conservatism wins. Liberalism is least favored, cannot gather financial support and cannot survive in a free market. It is supported by clandestine means only. What liberal broadcaster, network or writer holds a large audience in America? The last liberal stronghold is the newspaper, and they are dying. Now, ask those same questions about conservatives. Solution – quit listening to the liberals and go to work.

You can help me by going to work and put these policies in place instead of just repeatedly asking them over and over. Put policies in place that brings industry and production back to America. Quit trying to make the world happy with us – it isn’t going to happen. Support the allies that support us, the others can go fish. Build this country back up, they will seek us out.

I don’t expect an answer – all I’ve ever gotten in the mail from the Republican Party and my “representatives” are preprinted forms and form emails. Don’t ask me for money if you aren’t concerned about me or my neighbor and our opinions. Fix the economy so good Americans can go back to work for a decent wage so that we can live our lives. That’s all we want. Look at the poll numbers, all of us – Democrat, Republican and Independents are unhappy. We’re going to the polls to elect a new president soon. Start looking and acting like the party that will defeat Barack Obama, deflate a bloated and over-regulated government, and quit sending the same stuff back to my mailbox. Instead of a solution, it’s more like a broken record.

Older Entries