COMMUNIST RULES FOR REVOLUTION

Comments Off on COMMUNIST RULES FOR REVOLUTION

This article was captured in Dusseldorf, Germany, May 1919 by the Allied forces. No doubt, many of you have seen this before but I thought that it would be well to publish this again so that we could work and pray for the defeat of this revolution that it appears they’re trying so hard to put into effect this year of 2013. When I say they I’m speaking also about the UN, which I think is behind all of this as much as anyone else. Everyone should study this carefully and then work with others to help defeat it. The reason I am posting this is for people to read the list and then compare it to what has happened and is happening in the United States today.

 

Communist Rules for Revolution:

A. Corrupt the young; get them away from religion. Get them interested

in sex. Make them superficial; destroy their ruggedness.
B. Get control of all means of publicity, thereby:

1. Get people’s minds off their government by focusing their attention

on athletics, sexy books and plays and other trivialities.

2. Divide the people into hostile groups by constantly harping on

controversial matters of no importance.

3. Destroy the people’s faith in their natural leaders by holding them up

to contempt and ridicule.

4. Always preach true democracy, but seize power as fast and as

ruthlessly as possible.

5. By encouraging Government extravagance, destroy its credits,

produce fear of inflation with rising prices and general discontent.

6. Promote unnecessary strikes in vital industry, encourage civil

disorders and foster a lenient and soft attitude on the part of the

government toward such disorders.

7. By specious [fair-seeming but deceptive] argument, cause the

breakdown of old moral virtues, honesty and sobriety.
C. Cause the restriction of all firearms on some pretext with a view of

confiscating them and leaving the population helpless later.

 

Advertisements

bill prohibiting Tenn. funding for gun confiscation

Comments Off on bill prohibiting Tenn. funding for gun confiscation

Bet you didn’t hear this on the news….this happened in September 2012 in the UK:

Farmer in UK found guilty of murdering burglar

Obama Opposed Gun Ban Exception to Defend One’s Home

Tennessee also passed a bill in May of 2009 not allowing gun confiscation during an emergency. They did this because of what happened after Katrina in New Orleans. It appears this new bill needs to be killed, it says if the feds fund the confiscation, then it can proceed. Steve is checking to see if this is true or not. We’ll update this when he hears from them about this bill.

HB 0010 by *Faison ( SB 0040 by *Niceley)

Show Co-Prime Sponsors

Firearms and Ammunition – As introduced, prohibits the allocation of state or local public funds to the regulation or enforcement of any federal law, executive order, rule or regulation that becomes effective on or after January 1, 2013, that imposes restrictions on citizens who lawfully possess or carry firearms in this state; allows the allocation of state or local personnel or property to such regulation or enforcement if federal funding is provided. – Amends TCA Title 38; Title 39 and Title 40.

Tennessee State Representative Jeremy Faison (R-Cosby), and State Senator Frank Niceley (R-Strawberry Plains) introduced legislation today, House Bill 10, that would prohibit any Tennessee State funding from being used to confiscate firearms should the federal government outlaw certain weapons now legal, but which could be made illegal under a federal confiscation, law, rule, or executive order that becomes effective after January 1st, 2013 which “imposes restrictions on citizens who lawfully possess or carry firearms in this state; allows the allocation of state or local personnel or property to such regulation or enforcement if federal funding is provided.”

Representative Faison told The Examiner in an exclusive interview Thursday that the legislation isn’t just another gun bill, it is intended as a statement by Tennessee about the limits of federal power. “The founders of our republic understood that the States created the federal government,” Faison said “it seems to me that the child is trying to tell the parents what to do instead of the parents setting the rules for the unruly child.” Faison said he couldn’t think of a better issue for a confrontation with Washington, “I think we are well within our rights to tell Washington that if they are going to confiscate the firearms of law-abiding citizens and violate their constitutional rights, that the State of Tennessee isn’t going to help them pay for it.”

Read more

U.S. Marine Joshua Boston Pens Letter to Sen. Dianne Feinstein in Response to Proposed Gun Control Legislation

Comments Off on U.S. Marine Joshua Boston Pens Letter to Sen. Dianne Feinstein in Response to Proposed Gun Control Legislation

Feinstein

Below is a letter written by a former U.S. Marine, Cpl. Joshua Boston to Sen. Dianne Feinstein in response to the California Democrat’s proposal to tighten the nation’s gun laws in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School attack.

Boston discussed the letter this morning on Fox and Friends. Watch the interview!


Senator Dianne Feinstein,

I will not register my weapons should this bill be passed, as I do not believe it is the government’s right to know what I own. Nor do I think it prudent to tell you what I own so that it may be taken from me by a group of people who enjoy armed protection yet decry me having the same a crime. You ma’am have overstepped a line that is not your domain. I am a Marine Corps Veteran of 8 years, and I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have one.

I am not your subject. I am the man who keeps you free. I am not your servant. I am the person whom you serve. I am not your peasant. I am the flesh and blood of America. I am the man who fought for my country. I am the man who learned. I am an American. You will not tell me that I must register my semi-automatic AR-15 because of the actions of some evil man.

I will not be disarmed to suit the fear that has been established by the media and your misinformation campaign against the American public.

We, the people, deserve better than you.

Respectfully Submitted,
Joshua Boston
Cpl, United States Marine Corps
2004-2012

Fox News Insider

Wyoming Threatens Arrests for Federal Gun Grabbers

Comments Off on Wyoming Threatens Arrests for Federal Gun Grabbers

As the federal government continues to overstep it’s Constitutional bounds, we will see more of this type thing. It has been done with Obamacare as well.

(Breitbart) – As details continue to emerge regarding gun control plans that President Barack Obama and the Democrats are pushing behind the scenes, Wyoming lawmakers have a message for the federal government: “Don’t tread on us.”

Local radio station KTWO reports that lawmakers in Wyoming have proposed a “Firearms Protection Act” that provides a state-level annulment of any ban against semi-automatics or magazines that hold 20 or 30 rounds or more.

If the measure passes, it would mean that anyone–even federal agents-who try to enforce a ban within the state borders could be charged with a felony.

Is this the wave of the future for “red” states concerned about Obama’s strong anti-gun intentions?

It is too early to tell. But it is worth noting that Montana lawmakers began pushing for the same kind of legislation as soon as conservatives took control of that state’s legislature in 2010.

2013    STATE OF WYOMING   13LSO-0426   HOUSE BILL NO. HB0104

    Firearm Protection Act.

Sponsored by: Representative(s) Kroeker, Baker, Burkhart, Jaggi, Miller, Piiparinen, Reeder and

                   Winters and Senator(s) Dockstader and Hicks

A BILL for

  1. 1  ANACTrelatingtofirearms;providingthatanyfederallaw
  2. 2  which attempts to ban a semi-automatic firearm or to limit
  3. 3  the size of a magazine of a firearm or other limitation on
  4. 4  firearms in this state shall be unenforceable in Wyoming;
  5. 5  providing a penalty; and providing for an effective date.

6
7 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Wyoming: 8
9 Section 1. W.S. 6-8-405 is amended to read:

10

  1. 11  6-8-405. Offenses and penalties; defense of Wyoming
  2. 12  citizens.

13

  1. 14  (a) No public servant as defined in W.S. 6-5-101, or
  2. 15  dealer selling any firearm in this state shall enforce or
  3. 16  attempt to enforce any act, law, statute, rule or

1 HB0104

2013                  STATE OF WYOMING            13LSO-0426
  1. 1  regulation of the United States government relating to a
  2. 2  personal firearm, firearm accessory or ammunition that is
  3. 3  owned or manufactured commercially or privately in Wyoming
  4. 4  and that remains exclusively within the borders of Wyoming.

5

  1. 6  (b) Any official, agent or employee of the United
  2. 7  States government who enforces or attempts to enforce any
  3. 8  act, order, law, statute, rule or regulation of the United
  4. 9  States government upon a personal firearm, a firearm
  5. 10  accessory or ammunition that is owned or manufactured
  6. 11  commercially or privately in Wyoming and that remains
  7. 12  exclusively within the borders of Wyoming shall be guilty
  8. 13  of a misdemeanor felony and, upon conviction, shall be
  9. 14  subject to imprisonment for not more less than one (1) year
  10. 15  and one (1) day or more than five (5) years, a fine of not
  11. 16  more than two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) five thousand
  12. 17  dollars ($5,000.00), or both.

18

  1. 19  (c) The attorney general may defend a citizen of
  2. 20  Wyoming who is prosecuted by the United States government
  3. 21  for violation of a federal law relating to the manufacture,
  4. 22  sale, transfer or possession of a firearm, a firearm
  5. 23  accessory or ammunition owned or manufactured and retained
  6. 24  exclusively within the borders of Wyoming.

2 HB0104

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

(d) Any federal law, rule, regulation or order

created or effective on or after January 1, 2013 shall be

unenforceable within the borders of Wyoming if the law,

rule, regulation or order attempts to:

(i) Ban or restrict ownership of a semi-

automatic firearm or any magazine of a firearm; or

(ii) Require any firearm, magazine or other

firearm accessory to be registered in any manner.

Section 2. This act is effective immediately upon completion of all acts necessary for a bill to become law as provided by Article 4, Section 8 of the Wyoming Constitution.

(END)

2013                  STATE OF WYOMING            13LSO-0426

3 HB0104

Breitbart

Egyptian Press Confirms Washington Infiltrated By Islamists

Comments Off on Egyptian Press Confirms Washington Infiltrated By Islamists

You have to wonder, would a “Christian” man do this?

The radical Muslim Brotherhood doesn’t just threaten Israel and Mideast peace. According to the Egyptian press, several of its operatives have infiltrated the U.S. government and are influencing policy here.

The respected Egyptian magazine Rose al-Youssef has identified at least six Brotherhood-tied agents of influence who have worked into positions inside the Obama administration.

The weekly publication, founded in 1925, said the operatives have turned the White House “from a position hostile to Islamic groups and organizations in the world to the largest and most important supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood,” an Egyptian-based jihadist movement that supports Hamas and al-Qaida.

President Obama backed the Brotherhood’s takeover of Egypt and has courted its front groups in America. Secret Service records show their representatives making hundreds of visits to the White House since 2009.

“The Brotherhood in America is committed to destroying the West from within,” former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy told IBD, citing secret documents unearthed by the FBI after 9/11. “It has spent half a century building a considerable infrastructure here,” largely with Saudi funding.

“Unfortunately,” he added, “our government has done much to empower the Brotherhood’s American network under the guise of ‘Islamic outreach.'”

The lengthy Rose al-Youssef article, translated from Arabic by the Washington-based Investigative Project on Terrorism, is largely unsourced.

But ex-FBI agents who have investigated the Brotherhood’s influence operations inside the U.S. confirm some of those named in the story have come under scrutiny. They include:

• Mohamed Elibiary, a Homeland Security adviser who came under congressional fire for improperly accessing a federal database. The Egyptian magazine says he’s helped shape the administration’s counterterror strategy, including censoring FBI training materials dealing with jihad.

It also alleges he helped draft Obama’s remarks calling for former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak to leave power. Mubarak had banned the Brotherhood as a terrorist group.

• Rashad Hussain, former White House lawyer and now Obama’s special envoy to the Muslim world. Hussain, who has defended convicted terrorist Sami al-Arian and other U.S. Brotherhood leaders, helped draft Obama’s conciliatory speech in Cairo, where he invited banned Brotherhood leaders.

• Arif Alikhan, former assistant Homeland Security secretary for policy development and now a distinguished visiting professor of homeland security and counterterrorism at the National Defense University. As a Los Angeles city official, Alikhan worked with the Brotherhood-tied Muslim Public Affairs Council to derail police efforts to monitor radical mosques.

• Imam Mohamed Magid, another Homeland Security adviser, who heads the Islamic Society of North America, or ISNA, a Brotherhood front named by the Justice Department as an unindicted co-conspirator in a criminal plot to raise millions for Hamas.

Longtime ISNA board member Sayyid Syeed is captured in a new documentary, “The Grand Deception,” saying to fellow American Muslims: “Our job is to change the Constitution of America.”

Brotherhood agents posing as “moderate” Muslim leaders — such as now-jailed al-Qaida fundraiser Abdurahman Alamoudi — have successfully infiltrated previous administrations. But law enforcement officials say Brotherhood infiltration is more extensive and alarming under Obama.

Read More

Is British Crime Rate Really as Low as Piers Morgan Claims

Comments Off on Is British Crime Rate Really as Low as Piers Morgan Claims

The answer is no they aren’t. If you been watching the debates on CNN by Piers Morgan, you know he attempts to relate gun control to low crime rates and murders in the UK, but we know by the UK’s on admission at the Sunday Telegraph that Morgan is wrong. Since Piers Morgan is an intelligent man, I have to assume he knows these facts and chooses to ignore them in order to get his gun control agenda to be accepted by the American people. So here are the facts from the UK themselves, not Piers Morgan.

The number of violent crimes in England per person compared to America is significantly higher. England is a far more violent place than America, despite having a total gun ban. (see chart below)

Figures from the EU Commission and the UN show that the number of violent crimes per 100,000 residents in England is around 2,000 compared to just 466 in America. For all Piers Morgan’s claims about the proliferation of guns leading to an increase in violence, it’s four times safer to live in American than England and according to the latest FBI statistics, America’s violent crime rate continues to fall.

Gun crime 60pc higher than official figures…

The true level of gun crime is far higher than the Government admits in official statistics, it can be revealed.

Last year 5,600 firearms offences were excluded from the official figures. It means that, whereas the Home Office said there were only 9,800 offences in 2007/8, the real total was around 15,400. The latest quarterly figures, due to be released on Thursday, will again exclude a significant number of incidents.

The explanation for the gulf is that the Government figures only include cases where guns are fired, used to “pistol whip” victims, or brandished as a threat.

Thousands of offences including gun-smuggling and illegal possession of a firearm – which normally carries a minimum five-year jail sentence – are omitted from the Home Office’s headline count, raising questions about the reliability of Government crime data.

Source: EU Commission, UN

Dominic Grieve, the shadow home secretary, said: “These alarming new figures not only highlight the appalling state of gun crime in this country, but also remind us just how poor the Government’s statistics actually are.

“Crime statistics must also be compiled and published independent of the Home Office, and crime mapping rolled out so that people can have confidence in what they are being told about the state of crime in this country.”

Chris Huhne, the Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman, said the figures revealed the extent to which gun crime is a “scar on society”.

“It is shocking that the Home Office is in denial about the extent of gun crime by refusing to include offences where a gun is present but not brandished,” he said.

“This is another strong reason why the Home Office should not be in charge of collecting its own statistics, which should be put directly under the responsibility of the Office for National Statistics.

“Gun crime must be treated with the same seriousness and concern as knife crime. Both are a scar on our society.”

In all, there were at least 5,612 offences excluded from the Home Office’s official gun crime total last year, according to figures supplied by police forces.

The true total number of excluded offences will have been even higher, because two of the 43 forces in England and Wales, Thames Valley and Leicestershire, failed to hand over their data when asked to do so under the Freedom of Information Act, and a large urban force, Greater Manchester, provided incomplete statistics. Scotland records gun crime differently.

When the Home Office publishes its latest quarterly crime figures on Thursday, they will include a section on gun crime injuries and deaths, but the figures will again exclude a significant number of incidents.

The Sunday Telegraph‘s figures suggest that the Metropolitan Police’s official tally of 3,300 gun crimes in 2006/7, the most recent available, would have risen to around 5,000 if excluded categories had been counted. In 2007, Met officers dealt with 1,678 firearms incidents which were not included in the official tally. The Met’s figures show that offences of firearms possession in the capital rose from 850 five years ago to 1,400 last year.

After the Met, the second-highest number of offences excluded from the official statistics was recorded by West Midlands Police with 404, taking the force’s true annual total of gun crimes to around 1,400.

“Firearms offences are comparatively rare in Britain, and the vast majority thankfully do not result in a serious or fatal injury. But if the police already collect this information it is difficult to understand why it should not be put routinely into the public domain.”

The Sunday Telegraph also recently revealed that knife crime figures were at least two-thirds higher than official figures.

Police statistics showed forces in England and Wales are on course to record 38,000 serious knife crimes this year, or more than 100 a day, compared with last year’s official total of 22,151 offences, a figure announced by the Home Office in July in its first annual count of knife crimes.

Telegraph

Read more

Also we have from 2009:

The most violent country in Europe: Britain is also worse than South Africa and U.S.

Obama: Gun Control by Decree

Comments Off on Obama: Gun Control by Decree

Of course, it’s not legal or Constitutional, but that hasn’t stopped Obama ever! The President can create laws without going through Congress, in spite of the fact that there is no Constitutional provisions for doing so?

Heller v. District of Colombia (Case: 554 U.S. 570)

Justice Scalia wrote;
“…The conclusion of the court was that, The 2nd Amendment guarantee of the ‘Right to Bear Arms’ was a personal, not corporate, right; that it guaranteed the right to keep and bear those types of firearms typically possessed by law abiding citizens for the lawful purposes for use in personal defense as well as a deterrent against tyranny.”

Vice President Biden said Wednesday that the White House could use “executive orders” to deal with gun control, as he kicked off a round of meetings aimed at finding ways to curb gun violence.

The vice president met Wednesday with gun-safety and victims groups, saying he is “determined” to take “urgent action” to address gun violence.

“This is not an exercise in photo opportunities or just getting to ask you all what your opinions are. We are vitally interested in what you have to say,” Biden said.

The White House has sought to avoid prejudging what Biden’s recommendations would be. But the vice president hinted Wednesday that executive action — action by the president in which Congress would not have a say — would indeed be involved.

“There are executive orders, executive action that can be taken,” Biden said, adding “we haven’t decided what that is yet.”

He also said separate legislative action would be “required.”

Dan Gross, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, after the meeting affirmed that administration officials “talked about … their willingness to use executive action where that’s appropriate.”

You also might want to read:

Are Executive Orders Constitutional?

In Article I Section I of the Constitution it is clear that all legislative powers reside in Congress. The Executive Branch has the responsibility to execute the laws passed by Congess. An Executive Order is not legislation it is a order issued by the President to enforce laws passed by the Congress.

Any Executive Order that has any effect on individuals that are not government employees in a violation of Article I Section I. Whenever the President issues and Executive Order that extends to all of the people. Congress has a responsibility to the people to veto any Executive Order that has any effect on non governmental employees.

When a President issues an unconstitutional Executive Order and Congress allows the order to stand they are violating their oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution.

Older Entries